Angela Bradley - ThoughtCo

Essay on Responsibility for Elderly People

Elderly People: Who Will Share Responsibility for Them? In Great Britain, when some people are getting older, they usually go to the homes for elderly people, where nurses are taking care of them. Sometimes such service is paid by the government, but still there’s a question if the city should pay for it, or is it up to us to take care of our grandparents? Let’s take a closer look at the needs of elderly people in order to understand them better. Before we come to any sort of decision, it is important to find out what the main aspects of taking care of the elderly person are, no matter if it’s a relative or just a friend. It is important to remember that elderly people are precious. They are somebody’s parents and grandparents. Surely, caring for them can be hard and tiresome and very often people start thinking about nursing and retirement homes but it’s not the way out. Take a moment to find out if you could care about them on your own. Old people are in strong need of attention and affection. They have a lot of interesting stories to tell, as they have gone through so many life events. Remember, you may be the only one person who can help your elderly relatives enjoy the last years of their lives. Local nursing homes are, of course, a good place for the elderly people who have no family members and have to live their last days alone. Every country’s government should take care about their elderly citizens no matter of what age they are and what needs they have. But if there’s at least little possibility that you have an opportunity to take care about your granny or grandpapa on your own – do it! For elderly people it is vitally important to know that they have someone who will care for their health and safety. Once you have decided to take care about your grandparent, you need to make sure as many times as possible that they are alright. Provide them with all the necessary medical supply in order to give them an opportunity not to go to the doctor’s office or pharmacy. Display a

The Side Effect Of Drug Therapy - 1800 Words

With so many concerned about the side effect of drug therapy it led to many seeking alternative treatments such as cognitive therapy. This is when the patient talks to someone else when they have one of their episodes they can calm down and begin associating that memory with other things making the memory fade and replacing its trigger with something positive(therapeutic recreational journal). Another therapy that is commonly talked about is the eye movement desensitization therapy( EMDT). EDMT is eight phase treatment in which the psychologist helps the patient target a painful memory such as being in war and seeing things that emotionally scared the individual and studies the eye movements that happened when talking about the painful†¦show more content†¦By going out of a limb there are more and more types of therapies that are being tested and proven to help those that suffer from PTSD. PTSD is diagnosed through the statistical manual of mental disorders that is published by the American psychiatric association. The DSM-5 asks a series of questions that you base on your experiences from the previous two weeks since you ve taken the test. Some of the question are things such as â€Å"have you had little interest in doing things such or are you sleeping less than usual?†, and â€Å"are you drinking more than usual or taking any unprescribed medication?† All post traumatic stress disorder patients must experience these three different types of symptoms: re-experiencing symptoms, avoidance and numbing symptoms, and arousal symptoms. Re-experiencing symptoms are symptoms that involve reliving the traumatic event that is causing memories that are effecting you daily life.This is a required symptom in order to be truly diagnosed with PTSD, because if the memory only reoccurs a couple of times then it no longer effects you it is said just to be normal memory e ven though at the time it seemed traumatic it does not have the same effect as PTSD on the brain. There are many things that could cause PTSD, experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event. Even though many believe that you must experience the trauma the effect of watching something so traumatic happen to someone else can have the

Famous Thinker free essay sample

They each made specific contributions to society during difficult social times. The subject of this paper will examine the specific problems or ideas both of these famous thinkers sought to solve, and the solutions they came up with for implementation. The ideas and solutions met with interference from people opposing the change, and many of the solutions were is a constant state of refinement, but their individual solutions all met the test of logic, enabling them to overcome the difficulties and opposition to resolutions. The thinking of these two men went a long way in changing the way people thought, and shaped the outcome of their individual issues for the better. Russell for analytical philosophy based in realism, and King in defeating the injustice of segregation and inequality. Both men looked at the problem in different ways to find different perspectives that no one else had visited. They both were able to visualize that produced ideas and solutions to issues. They both had the patience to refine their ideas and solutions to overcome opposition. Bertrand Russell made many different contributions to society including establishing the basis of contemporary mathematical logic, the founder of analytical philosophy, and providing controversial views in political theory, religious studies and education, that produced the thought of never accepting inference over factual evidence (Irvine, 2010). Martin Luther King’s contribution to society included obtaining civil rights for African Americans, and changing the way America viewed issues of equality. His vision of a color-blind society that valued every man or woman, regardless of race, challenged America to expand its values to embrace its diversity. The social and political environment during Bertrand Russell’s life influenced his philosophical views pertaining to politics and education, and he was an outspoken critic of nuclear proliferation. Set against the backdrop of World War I, he became socially active against war, and its aftermath. He used this platform to proclaim that education was the key to social progress (Irvine, 2010). His social philosophy was based on not only understanding nature, but placed an equal importance on the need to understand one another. His anti-war protests led to convictions, imprisonment, and fines, and also contributed to him losing his teaching positions at different colleges. The social and political environment surrounding Dr. King was that of racial tension, oppression, and inequality, influencing his resolve to exact the changes necessary to right the wrongs of oppression. According to the King Institute, Martin experienced racism at a young age and knew of the dangers of continuing on this path (2010). These factors forced Dr. King to become creative in how to obtain equality and civil rights. He used civil disobedience and a non-violence approach that were unheard of during this time in American History. One of the problems Bertrand Russell’s ideas attempted to solve was to use logical analysis when determining the truth about ordinary claims based on inference. This meant every claim or truth should be based on logical constructions that should be used instead of inferred entities. The problem Dr. King’s ideas attempted to solve the moral issue of racism, and the injustice of inequality associated with it. This meant breaking down a political system by appealing to the principles of democracy. Bertrand Russell’s solution to his problem was introducing a distinction between two different types of knowledge of truth—truth that is direct, certain, intuitive, and infallible, and the truth that is indirect, uncertain, derivative, and open to error. He justified his position by proving that indirect knowledge must be able to stand up to more fundamental or direct knowledge. In other words, inference alone does not prove truth. Provable facts or direct knowledge leads to real truth. Dr. King’s solution to his problem was promoting civil disobedience among African Americans to counteract the immoral acts of racism and segregation. His philosophy maintained that it is the responsibility of each individual to disobey unjust laws (Ware, 2009). He believed that integration was the key to gaining equality, and he promoted a non-violent policy to achieve his solution. His non-violent policy was based on his belief that the battle against segregation should be fought in a courtroom instead of the street (Ware, 2009). The assumption that could have interfered with Bertrand Russell’s creative process was that of thinking everyone would be as enthusiastic and accepting of his theories relating to realism. Perception about truth based on accepted traditional beliefs was very real during the early 1900’s. He refined his solution by using analytical reasoning and logic to prove the direct link between direct knowledge and inferred knowledge. His solutions met the tests of logic in that they were reasonable, and provable. He used the process of writing educational books, and teaching to implement his solutions, by recognizing the fallacies of accepting a claim without factual proof to back it up. The assumption that could have derailed Dr. King in his quest for equal rights was his belief that everyone would adhere to a nonviolent policy that promoted civil disobedience. Nonviolence in the face of extreme adversity and ridicule takes a certain amount of discipline and courage. He refined his solution by continuously using peaceful demonstrations in different parts of the country that illuminated his cause as morally just. His solutions met the tests of logic because of the moral agenda behind his cause, and the reasonableness of his belief that this cause would improve mankind. Although his methods were unorthodox at the time, they were widely accepted and implemented by his followers. He overcame opposition to his solutions by staying true to himself and his beliefs. He stood on moral high ground, and believed in the rule of law and decency to win his fight.

Makah Indians Essays - Whaling, Animal Rights, Makah, Clallam County

Makah Indians The Makah are a Native Indian tribe who have recently decided to enact their treaty rights, and start to hunt for whales. These actions have caused an uproar in North America. The Natives state that they are not doing anything but exercising their legal rights. Opponents to their hunting of whales argue that the Makah are a group of uncivilized and inhumane individuals, and that they are harming nature. The reportage of the controversy surrounding the Makah can be seen as ethnocentric in many ways. Through the language used by the media involved in the controversy, one can constantly see the Native people being viewed as inhumane savages. In turn, this language allows readers to be sent mixed messages about the Makah and their position in the whaling dispute. Finally, the protestors themselves have contradictory arguments which leads one to question the motivating factors behind their position. In order to fully understand the whaling controversy, it is necessary to understand the history of the Makah. They were a group of Native people who hunted gray whales. As a result of their increased trade with the Europeans, the 'white man' decided to also enter this hunt for the whale. This competition between the Makah and the'white man' lead to the whale coming close to extinction. Due to their love for nature and respect for the whale, the Makah decided to voluntarily refrain from hunting whales. It is important to note however, that in 1855, the Governor of Washington State agreed to the Treaty Of Neah Bay, which gave the Makah a right to hunt for whales. This is what is at the heart of the controversy. The Makah have recently enacted their hunting rights of the whale after seventy years, and are now resuming their hunt for whales. The Makah reasoning is a relatively simple one. In 1946, the gray whale population was 2000, and now their count is over 26,000. They believe that it is safe to hunt for whales again. The Makah have been a group of people who have relied on whale hunting. . They used the blubber from the whale to feed their families, and they used the rest of the whale to provide themselves with shelter and tools. However, their opponents have dismissed this practice of hunting whales as inhumane. Through the language that is being used by the media, one can see Native people being viewed as savages. The language being used is not blatantly discriminatory against the Native people, but is done in a subtle, yet powerful way, in order to evoke a message that Native people are inhumane. One of the reasons for this negative commentary regarding Native people hunting for whales could be due to ethnocentrism. This is the belief that one's own culture is considered to be normal, therefore, other cultures are considered abnormal. The media carefully uses words that show their bias towards the Native People. The media tries to make the Makah look like a band of savages. While writing about a recent anti-whaling demonstration, Peggy Andersen writes, "In a simmering dispute that ended with a scuffle and arrests, angry Makah Indians pelted a protest boat with rocks as the two sides bickered over a tribal plan to hunt gray whales." The wording of this opening paragraph leads the reader to think that it was Makah who were causing trouble, and that they were the one's that were arrested. However, if one were to complete the article, they would realize that this was not the case. Another example of media bias against the Makah people is when Jonathan Dube writes, "As much as it's possible for one dead animal to give new life to an entire nation, that's what has happened here." Dube is implying that it is impossible for an animal that has died to bring life to a nation, however, that is what has occurred. He does not understand how killing this whale could give life to the Makah, and therefore, he conveys this message of doubt to his readers. Dube is indirectly stating that the Makah need to kill in order to have life. Many readers and viewers of the media are being sent mixed messages about the Makah and the whaling situation. As seen above, the media is using certain language that portrays the Makah in an unflattering manner. However, this also has another major impact. The true message, and plight of the Makah is being lost and overshadowed by this harsh, and biased language. People reading newspaper articles probably

The Fashion Channel Essays

The Fashion Channel Essays The Fashion Channel Essay The Fashion Channel Essay After analyzing the proposed scenarios it is recommend TFH adopting Scenario-3: Focuses on both Factionists and Shoppers/Planners segments. 2. The recommendation is based on the scenarios analysis and the decision matrix outcome. The main reason for this selection would be Its superior projected net profit over the other scenarios margin) as well as Its source. For this approach, revenue increases from both premiership and CPM. A diversified revenue source reduces risk of meeting revenue projection and risk of losing cable striation support due to ratings decrease. Another Important aspect Is that Its a well balanced solution between two desired phenomena: differentiation from competitors and creating a loyal customer base which are less likely to shift to competitors programs. Targeting shows to a narrow (and profitable) segment of viewers would brand the network as a premium fashion provider, a channel that Is focused only on delivering high quality and do not intends to satisfies all. A positive by product of this approach would be higher customer retention which has higher monetary value than the casual viewer (acquiring a new costumer is estimated to cost about 5 time more than retaining one). Note that although scenario-2 as well delivers these values it incurs higher risk due to its aggressive and narrow market Finally, although the channel is still generating a healthy profit segmentation. And therefore one would be reluctant to changes, this suggested graduate, less drastic change would help management to stand behind it from other business aspects such finance, accounting, operation and shareholder value.

Capital Punishment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 1

Capital Punishment - Essay Example Whatever the reasons they put forward for their proposal, on very few instances will you have individual to be hanged thought of as a human being like any other. Many people actually think of him as an object (Moore 3). Very few people think of the individual as having a conscious. It is this aspect of the individual to be hanged that George Orwell brings to our attention, in his story, â€Å"A hanging†. The story details the last moments of a small Indian man just about to be taken to the gallows. His hands bound tightly to his body and guarded by strong warders who guide him gently to his death there are three interruptions of episodes that take place, which pique the interest of the writer as to the conscious nature of the prisoner. At the beginning, a dog rushes to him and jumps to lick his face. The individual also side steps a puddle on his path as he is led to the gallows while the third instance happens as he has the hangman’s noose around his neck. He calls out to his god with the words â€Å"ram, ram, ram†. However as all these things go on, the wardens and the other prisoners go on their business as if there is nothing absurd about it. In fact, later on they seem to be celebrating the life just terminated. The fact that they do not seem to think that the same fate will befall them is ironical more so after they are seen to be laughing and in a jovial mood a short moment after the Hindu has been hanged. George Orwell connects the reader with the man just about to be hung and strikes the mind of the reader to think more of him (Orwell 2). He makes us realize that the man is not just another object but rather a living human being whose body processes are taking place like in any other person. It is a call to rethink the capital sentence. II) Body Interruptions before the hanging: 1) The dog This comes as the first interruption to the hanging of the Indian man. It is as they lead the man to the gallows that a dog appeared in the pris on’s yard. It hounded around the procession or the group and in the words of the writer â€Å"wild with glee at finding so man human being together†. Everyone is surprised when it suddenly dashed to the small Indian prisoner and â€Å"jumping up tried to lick his face†. The inclusion of the dog in the story is of great significance to the theme of the whole story. It goes on to prance at the prisoner just about to be hung and wanting to lick his face. The fact that it does not discriminate the prisoner from the wardens goes on to affirm the thought that the Indian man is like any other living being. 2) The puddle The second episode even sinks the perception of hanging as evil even more. It involves a puddle that lay on the path to the gallows. The man would have been expected to not to care about the puddle and just walk through it instead since he was just about to be hung anyway. However, what happens proves one incredible truth. Orwell states that â€Å"in s pite of the men who gripped him by each shoulder, he stepped slightly aside to avoid a puddle on the path†. This episode opens the eyes of the writer as to the meaning of destroying a conscious and healthy man. It goes on to show the inappropriate nature and the mystery surrounding the termination of the life just when it was â€Å"in full tide†. The fact that the man was conscious jerked the mind of the writer (and consequently the reader) as to the fact that he was alive the same way that they were alive.